An Analysis of Multiple Choices Distractors Made by Teachers of SMP Negeri Malaka Barat

Authors

  • Chamelya Vivi Crystanty Sene Universitas San Pedro , Indonesia
  • Antonia Tefa Universitas San Pedro , Indonesia
  • Rozita Yusniaty Lodo Universitas San Pedro , Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v6i1.12147

Keywords:

Soal Tes, Distraktor, Tes Bahasa Inggris, Evaluasi, Pilihan Ganda

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui tingkat pengecoh yang termasuk dalam soal tes yang dibuat oleh guru bahasa Inggris di SMP Negeri Malaka Barat. Penulis menggunakan kombinasi metode untuk analisis data. Alat yang digunakan adalah dokumen berisi empat puluh soal ujian pilihan ganda. Rumus dari teori Nitko diterapkan pada analisis data. Berdasarkan analisis dari segi pengecoh, terdapat 14,375% pengecoh sangat buruk, 28,125% pengecoh buruk, 18,125% pengecoh sedang, 20% pengecoh baik, dan 19,375% atau 31 dari 160 pengecoh sangat baik. Oleh karena itu, disarankan adanya revisi terhadap soal tes bahasa Inggris mengenai pengecoh berdasarkan temuan penelitian.

References

Angel, C, et.all. 2021. An Analysis of English Summative Test of Tenth Grade Students At a Senior High School In Indonesia. http://jtam.ulm.ac.id/index.php/gej/article/view/922

Arikunto, S. 2013. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara

Burton, Steven J 1991. How to Prepare Better Multiple-Choice Test Items: Guidelines for University Faculty. Brigham Young University Testing Services and the Department of Instructional Sciences.

Chen D & Varghese A. 2013. Testing and Evaluation of Language Skills. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, ISSN: 2320-737X, Vol. 1, Issue (March-April 2013) PP 31-33

Djiwandono, Soenardi M.2008. Tes Bahasa: Pegangan Bagi Pengajar Bahasa. Jakarta: PT Indeks.

Hoshino, Yuko. (2013).“Relationship between Types of Distractor and Difficulty of Multiple-choice Vocabulary Tests in Sentencial Context”, Springer; Language Testing in Asia, 13.

Hughes, A. 2003. Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nitko, Anthony J. 1996. Educational Assessment of Students, Second Edition, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Merrill

Suek, L. 2021. Item Analysis of An English Summative Test. Retrieved from. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355693932_ITEM_ANALYSIS_OF_AN_ENGLISH_SUMMATIVE_TEST

Sugianto, A. 2020. Item Analysis of English Summative Test: EFL Teacher-Made Test. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338924122_Item_Analysis_of_English_Summative_Test_EFL_Teacher-Made_Test

Downloads

Published

30-05-2022

How to Cite

Sene, C. V. C., Tefa, A., & Lodo, R. Y. (2022). An Analysis of Multiple Choices Distractors Made by Teachers of SMP Negeri Malaka Barat . Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(1), 31534–31539. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v6i1.12147

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): April 2022

Section

Articles of Research

Citation Check

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Chamelya Vivi Crystanty Sene

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).