Analisis Biaya Transaksi pada Siklus Usahatani Jagung di Kabupaten Dompu Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v5i3.2295Keywords:
Biaya Transaks, Usahatani Jagung, Pertanian, Kabupaten DompuAbstract
Karakteristik pasar tidak sempurna ditandai dengan adanya biaya transaksi. Salah satu sektor yang merupakan pasar tidak sempurna adalah sektor pertanian. Biaya transaksi pada usahatani jagung hibrida akan mempengaruhi tinggi rendahnya keuntungan usahatani jagung hibrida. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis struktur biaya transaksi dan implikasi biaya transaksi terhadap manfaat usahatani jagung hibrida. Metode penelitian menggunakan analisis biaya transaksi dan regresi linier berganda. Penelitian dilakukan di Kabupaten Dompu, Nusa Tenggara Barat dengan 120 responden sebagai petani jagung. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat enam siklus pada usahatani jagung di Kabupaten Dompu. Adapun enam siklus tersebut yakni; (1) siklus pratanam; (2) siklus tanam; (3) siklus pemeliharaan; (4) pengawasan; (5) siklus panen; dan (6) siklus pascapanen. Dari enam siklus tersebut siklus pascapanen merupakan siklus yang memiliki persentase tertinggi sebesar 23,17%, kemudian siklus pemeliharaan sebesar 18,53%, siklus panen sebesar 17,65%, siklus tanam sebesar 17,28% dan siklus pengwasan sebesar 13,99%.
References
Angraini, E. (2005). Analisis Biaya Transaksi dan Penerimaan Nelayan dan Petani di Palabuhan Ratu Kabupaten Sukabumi. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Retrieved from https://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/8047
Arsyad, L. (2010). Ekonomi Pembangunan (5th ed.). Yogyakarta: STIM YKPN.
Bambang. (2017). Agribisnis Jagung Sebagai Lokomotif Penanggulangan Kemiskinan di Kabupaten Dompu. Dompu.
Benham, A., & Benham, L. (2001). The Costs of Exhange. Ronald Coase Institute Working Papers, 1. Retrieved from http://www.coase.org/workingpapers/wp-1.pdf
Budiman. (2014). Analisis komparatif biaya transaksi petani rumput laut dalam kontrak lembaga keuangan formal-informal dan pengaruhnya terhadap kesejahteraan. Universitas Brawijaya.
Coase, R. H. (1992). The Institutional Structure of Production. The American Economic Review, 82(4), 713–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69305-5_3
Collinson, C., Kleih, U., Burnett, D., Muganga, A., Jagwe, J., & Ferris, R. S. B. (2002). Transaction cost analysis for selected crops with export potential in Uganda. ASARECA/IITA Monograph, (October).
Dwiastuti, R. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian “ Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian”: Dilengkapi Pengenalan berbagai Perspektif Pendekatan Metode Penelitian. Malang: UB Press.
Furubotn and Richter. (1999). Agricultural Economics & Economics. Agricultural Economics & Economics, (1996), 149–152.
Leonardo, A., & Robert, E. (1997). The Effect of Trnsaction Costs on Labor Market Participation and Earnings: Evidence From Rural Philippine Markets. Econstor.
Mburu, J. and R. B. (2002). Wildlife Co-mangement in Kenya: An Empirical Analysis of Landowners’ Incentives for Participation. Conference on International Agricultural Research for Development, (Gurung 1995), 1995–1999.
Menard, C. (2000). Institutions, Contracts and Organizations “Perspectives from New Institutional Economics.”
Mishkin, S. F. (2008). Buku Ekonomi Uang, Perbankan dan Pasar Keuangan Buku 1 (8th ed.). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Mmbando, F. E., Wale, E. Z., Baiyegunhi, L. J. S., Mmbando, F. E., Wale, E. Z., The, L. J. S. B., … Baiyegunhi, L. J. S. (2017). Development in Practice The welfare impacts of market channel choice by smallholder farmers in Tanzania The welfare impacts of market channel choice by smallholder. Development in Practice, 27(7), 981–993. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2017.1353066
Montalbano, P., Pietrelli, R. &, & Salvatici, L. (2018). Participation in the market chain and food security?: The case of the Ugandan maize farmers. Food Policy, 76(March), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.03.008
Narayan, D. (1999). Bonds and Bridges?: Social Capital And Poverty.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. North, Douglass C. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606892.012
Rudi, H. Peru & Trias, Q. D. (2017). Rudi, H. Peru & Trias, Qurnia Dewi. (2017). Panduan Praktis Budidaya Jagung, Jakarta, Penebar Swadaya. (F. A. Nurrohman, Ed.). Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya.
Sultan, H., & Rachmina, D. (2016). Pengaruh Biaya Transaksi terhadap Keuntungan Usahatani Kedelai Di Kabupaten Lamongan , Jawa Timur. Forum Agribisnis, 6(2), 161–178. Retrieved from http://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/fagb/article/view/17242
Supratikno, H. (2010). Ekonomi Nurani Vs Ekonomi Naluri.pdf. (M. dan J. Am, Ed.) (Pertama). Jakarta: Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Tefera, D. A. J. B. and M. A. S. (2016). Agricultural Co-Operatives In Ethiopia: Evolution, Functions and Impact. Journal of International Development, 96(1), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid
Turvani, M. (1996). The Core of the Firm: The Issue of the Employoyer-Employee Relationship.
Voors, M. J., & Haese, M. D. (2010). Smallholder dairy sheep production and market channel development?: An institutional perspective of rural Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. Journal of Dairy Science, 93(8), 3869–3879. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2685
Williamson, O. E. (1981). The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–577. https://doi.org/10.1086/227496
Williamson, O. E. (1989). Chapter 3 Transaction cost economics. Handbook of Industrial Organization, 1, 135–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-448X(89)01006-X
Williamson, O. E. (1998). Transaction Cost Economics: How It Works; Where It is Headed. De Economist, 146(1), 23–58. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1003263908567
Yustika & Rukavina. (2015). Konsep Ekonomi Kelembagaan Perdesaan Pertanian dan Kedaulatan Pangan. Malang: Empat Dua.
Yustika, A. E. (2012). Ekonomi Kelembagaan “ Paradigma, Teori dan Kebijakan”. (Novietha I. Sallama, Ed.). Jakarta: Erlangga.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Dodo Kurniawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
