The Effect Of The Combination Of Task Repetition And Post -task Transcribing On Students’ Fluency In Speaking English

Authors

  • Afdanil Haq Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat , Indonesia
  • Yelfiza Yelfiza Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat , Indonesia
  • M.Khairi Ikhsan Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat , Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v6i1.2850

Keywords:

task repetition, , post-task transcribing, speech rate

Abstract

This research was quantitative research that aimed to find out how the development of students' speaking fluency when the teacher applied the combination of task repetition and post-task transcribing in the speech class at Universitas PGRI Sumatra Barat. The technique of data collection was purposive sampling. research instruments were a video recorder and document. The researcher used the speech rate indicator (the number of syllables produced in one minute) to know students' speaking fluency. From the research data, it was found that the average of students' speech rate is increasing in each meeting and the speaking level of students remained at a slow level. Based on data analysis and discussion, the researcher concluded that the combination of task repetition and post-task transcribing was not very effective in improving students' speaking fluency in English because not all students increased their speech rate in each meeting.

References

Airasian P, M. G. & G. L. . (2012). Educational research: Compentencies for analysis and application (Vol. 148).

Argawati. (2014). Improving students’ speaking skill using group discussion (experimental study on the first grade students of senior high school). Eltin Journal, Journal of English Language Teaching in Indonesia, 2(II), 74–81.

Brown, M. T. (2004). A picture is worth a thousand words: Energy systems language and simulation. Ecological Modelling, 178(1–2), 83–100.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). QUALITATIVE INQUIRY RESEARCH DESIGN.Choosing Amoung Five Approach (THIRD EDIT).

Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Isaacs, T., & Saito, K. (2015). Does a speaking task affect second language comprehensibility? Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 80–95.

Ellis, R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474–509.

Gramer, M., & Sprintschnik, E. (2008). Social anxiety and cardiovascular responses to an evaluative speaking task: The role of stressor anticipation. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(2), 371–381.

Hsu, H. C. (2017). The combined effect of task repetition and post-task transcribing on L2 speaking complexity, accuracy, and fluency. Language Learning Journal, 47(2), 172–187.

Kawulich, B. B. (2015). Collecting Data Through Observation. Doing Qualitative Research in Language Education, May, 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56492-6_4

Kormos, J., & Dénes, M. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32(2), 145–164.

Oxford, R. (2006). Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning?: An Overview The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly Volume 8 , Issue 3 Special Conference Proceedings Volume?: Task-based Learning in the Asian Context Editors?: Paul Robertson and Joseph Jung. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 8(February), 94–121.

Prof.Dr.Sugiono. (2014). METODE PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF DAN KUALITATIF DAN R&D. Alfabeta,Bandung.

Rahayu, P., Ramadhan, S., Agustina, Siregar, S. D., Jufrizal, Rozimela, Y., Indriyani, V., Zaim, M., & Atmazaki. (2020). Teaching Speaking Through Techno Driven Task (Zig Zag Task). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1471(1).

Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. In European Journal of Teacher Education. Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C. (2009). Teaching Listening and Speaking: From theory to Practice (RELC Portfolio Series). Singapore: Regional Language Center, June.

Selti, G. W., Angrum, A. T., & Hasanah, N. I. (2019). an Analysis Materials of Speaking on Student English Textbook. Intensive Journal, 1(1), 28.

Tauroza, S., & Allison, D. (1990). Speech rates in British English. Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 90–105.

Yalç?n, Ö., & ?nceçay, V. (2014). Foreign Language Speaking Anxiety: The case

Downloads

Published

20-01-2022

How to Cite

Haq, A. ., Yelfiza, Y., & Ikhsan, M. . (2022). The Effect Of The Combination Of Task Repetition And Post -task Transcribing On Students’ Fluency In Speaking English. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(1), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v6i1.2850

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): April 2022

Section

Articles of Research

Citation Check

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Afdanil Haq, Yelfiza Yelfiza, M.Khairi Ikhsan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).