The Description of the Eighth Graders’ Ability on Writing Recount Text of SMP Negeri 1 Gunungsitoli Barat in 2022/2023

Authors

  • Destika Triany Teluambanua English Education Study Program, Nias University , Indonesia
  • Adieli Laoli English Education Study Program, Nias University , Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v7i2.6520

Keywords:

Teks Recount, Kemampuan Siswa, Menulis

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis dan mendeskripsikan kemampuan siswa dalam menulis teks recount, dan untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor apa saja yang mempengaruhi siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Gunungsitoli Barat dalam menulis teks recount. Desain penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif deskriptif. Hasil penelitian adalah 8 (50%) siswa tergolong baik, 7 (38,89%) siswa tergolong rata-rata, dan 2 (11,11%) siswa tergolong miskin. Permasalahan siswa dalam menulis teks recount adalah kesulitan dalam menentukan kata kerja bantu apa yang tepat untuk digunakan dalam tenses, kesulitan dalam menggunakan bentuk lampau, kesulitan dalam mengubah posisi subjek dan objek dalam kalimat, dan tidak dapat memahami arti dari teks recount. sebuah kalimat. Kemudian, penyebabnya adalah faktor dari diri sendiri, keluarga, sekolah, dan lingkungan masyarakat. Akhirnya, berdasarkan temuan, dapat disimpulkan bahwa siswa mampu menulis teks recount pribadi.

References

Anderson, M., & Anderson, K. (2003). Text types in English 1. : Macmillan.

Anney, V. N. (2014). Ensuring the Quality of the Findings of Qualitative Research: Looking at Trustworthiness Criteria. Department of Psychology and Curriculum Studies, P.O. Box 35048, School of Education, Tanzania.

Anwar, S. (2014). Analysis of Written Interlanguage of ESL Students with Persian Backgrounds. ProQuest.

Autila, Rani & Theresia, M. (2017). Improving Students’ Writing Skill of Recount Text Trough Diary Writing and Peer Editing Technique:P-ISSN:2580-1287.E-ISSN:2597-6346. STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat, Indonesia.

Creswell, Jhon, (2014), Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitaive, and Mixed Method Approach/ 4th ed. California.

Johnson, S. & Rasulova, S. (2016). Qualitative Impact Evaluation, Incorporating Authenticity into the Assessment of Rigour: ISSN: 2040-3151. The centre for development studies, university of bath claverton down, bath, BA27AY, UK.

Knapp, Peter & Watkins, Megan. (2005). Genre, Text, Grammar:Technologies for Teaching and Assessing Writing. Australia: UNSW Press.

Martinet, T. (2014). Practical English Grammaar. Oxford Unversity Press

Nassaji, H. (2015). Language Teaching Research. Vol.19(2) 129-132. Canada: University of Victoria.

Palmer, C.M & Bolderstone. A.M. (2010). A Brief Introduction to Qualitative Research. Elsevier: Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologist.

Robert, C. Bogdan, and Sari Knopp Biklen. (2011) Qualitative Research for Education 5th Edition an Introduction to Theories and Methods, (Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.,)

Downloads

Published

26-05-2023

How to Cite

Teluambanua, D. T. ., & Laoli, A. . (2023). The Description of the Eighth Graders’ Ability on Writing Recount Text of SMP Negeri 1 Gunungsitoli Barat in 2022/2023. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(2), 5054–5057. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v7i2.6520

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): Agustus 2023

Section

Articles of Research

Citation Check

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Destika Triany Teluambanua

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).