The Potential of Universal Design for Learning to Enhance Academic Engagement of Students with Disabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v7i2.9239Keywords:
Universal Design for Learning, Academic Engagement, Siswa Penyandang DisabilitasAbstract
Siswa difabel yang belajar di kelas reguler umumnya mengalami kesulitan dalam mengakses kurikulum umum. Akibatnya, mereka harus berjuang untuk terlibat dalam kegiatan pembelajaran. Keterlibatan akademik siswa penyandang disabilitas terdiri dari keterlibatan kognitif, keterlibatan perilaku, dan keterlibatan emosional. Keterlibatan akademik yang rendah akan berdampak pada prestasi akademik siswa. Oleh karena itu, academic engagement menjadi salah satu indikator keberhasilan siswa berkebutuhan khusus di kelas reguler. UDL adalah kerangka desain pengajaran yang menekankan keberhasilan belajar untuk semua siswa dengan atau tanpa kebutuhan khusus. Salah satu prinsip utama UDL adalah mengembangkan berbagai cara agar siswa dapat mengakses pembelajaran. Berdasarkan konsep tersebut, penulis melakukan penelitian dengan menggunakan metode literature review. Tujuannya untuk mengetahui potensi UDL dalam meningkatkan keterlibatan siswa berkebutuhan khusus di kelas reguler, kemudian mencoba mengembangkan ilustrasi desain pengajaran sederhana berbasis UDL.
References
J. S. Brown, “SMART SOCIAL NETWORKING?: 21 CENTURY TEACHING,” vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 21–29, 2017.
G. A. D. Liem, “Fostering student engagement in schools?: International best practices,” vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 121–130, 2017.
P. A. S. Moreira et al., “Engagement with School in Students with Special Educational Needs,” pp. 361–375, 2015.
G. L. Macklem, Gayle L. Macklem. Springer, 2015.
O. Alrashidi, H. P. Phan, and B. H. Ngu, “Academic Engagement?: An Overview of Its Definitions , Dimensions , and Major Conceptualisations,” vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 41–52, 2016.
J. J. Appleton, S. L. Christenson, D. Kim, and A. L. Reschly, “Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement?: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument,” vol. 44, pp. 427–445, 2006.
J. A. Fredricks, P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris, “School Engagement?: Potential of the Concept , State of the Evidence Author ( s ): Jennifer A . Fredricks , Phyllis C . Blumenfeld and Alison H . Paris Published by?: American Educational Research Association Stable URL?: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3516061 School Engagement?: Potential of the Concept , State of the Evidence,” vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 59–109, 2019.
A. Heelan, “Universal Design for Learning ( UDL ): Implications for Education,” 2015.
Zydney&Hasselbring, “Mini anchors?: A universal design for learning approach,” TechTrends, vol. 58, no. 6, 2014.
J. Lee, “The Relationship Between Student Engagement and Academic Performance?: Is It a Myth or Reality??,” no. October, 2017.
S. J. Courey, P. Tappe, J. Siker, and P. Lepage, “Improved Lesson Planning With Universal Design for Learning ( UDL ),” 2012.
M. V. Izzo, “Universal Design for Learning?: Enhancing Achievement of Students with Disabilities,” vol. 14, no. Dsai, pp. 343–350, 2012.
M. M. Abell, E. Jung, and M. Taylor, “Students ’ perceptions of classroom instructional environments in the context of ‘ Universal Design for Learning ,’” pp. 171–185, 2011.
D. E. Narkon and J. C. Wells, “Improving Reading Comprehension for Elementary Students With Learning Disabilities?: UDL Enhanced Story Mapping,” no. December 2014, pp. 37–41, 2013.
D. Basham, M. Israel, J. Graden, R. Poth, and M. Winston, “A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO RTI?: EMBEDDING UNIVERSAL DESIGN FOR LEARNING AND TECHNOLOGY,” vol. 33, pp. 243–256, 2010.
N. Council and M. Teaching, “Universal design for learning Making the Most of,” vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 166–172, 2011.
D. Glass, A. Meyer, and D. H. Rose, “and the Arts,” vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 98–120, 2013.
D. Meyer.A , Rose.D, Gordon, Universal Design for Learning Theory and Practice. CAST Professional Publishing, 2014.
R. B. Miller, B. A. Greene, and G. P. Montalvo, “Engagement in Academic Work?: The Role of Engagement in Academic Work?: The Role of Learning Goals , Future Consequences , Pleasing Others ,” no. November 2017, 1996.
Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. 2012.
M. W. Jennifer Fredericks, “Handbook of Research on Student Engagement,” Handb. Res. Student Engagem., pp. 1–840, 2012.
M. G. Michael, B. J. Trezek, M. G. Michael, and B. J. Trezek, “Universal Design and Multiple Literacies?: Creating Access and Ownership for Students,” vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 311–318, 2019.
R. P. Dolan and T. E. Hall, “Universal Design for Learning?: Implications for Large-Scale Assessment,” vol. 27, pp. 22–25, 2001.
M. E. King-sears et al., “An Exploratory Study of Universal Design for Teaching Chemistry to Students With and Without Disabilities,” 2015.
G. Rappolt-schlichtmann, S. G. Daley, S. Lim, S. Lapinski, K. H. Robinson, and M. Johnson, “Universal Design for Learning and Elementary School Science?: Exploring the Efficacy , Use , and Perceptions of a Web-Based Science Notebook Universal Design for Learning and Elementary School Science?: Exploring the Efficacy , Use , and Perceptions of a Web-Based Science Notebook,” no. November 2014, 2013.
K. Rao and G. Meo, “Using Universal Design for Learning to Design Standards-Based Lessons,” 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Gaby Arnez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
