Faktor Penentu Kesejahteraan Subjektif Mahasiswa : Sebuah Studi Eksploratif di Universitas Negeri Padang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v5i1.1157Keywords:
Faktor Penentu, Kesejahteraan, MahasiswaAbstract
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengeksplorasi faktor penentu kesejahteraan subjektif mahasiswa di Universitas Negeri Padang. Metode penelitian ini adalah kualitatif eksplorasi dengan jumlah responden sebanyak 115 mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Padang di Kota Padang yang dipilih melalui teknik cluster sampling. Pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik kuesioner yang disebar pada mahasiswa di seluruh fakultas di Universitas negeri Padang di kota Padang. Data yang diperoleh kemudian dianalisis menggunakan analisis tematik dan melalui proses keabsahan data dengan peer debriefing. Penelitian ini menemukan enam tema utama yang menjadi determinan kesejahteraan mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Padang di Kota Padang. Keenam determinan tersebut antara lain adalah faktor individu mahasiswa (32.62%), kepuasan dalam relasi (24.55%), kepuasan akademik (17.36%), ekonomi (12.28%), kepuasan terhadap diri (6.60%), dan afeksi (6.59%).
References
Anindya, A.S., & Soetjiningsih, C.H. (2017). Kepuasan perkawinan degan kesejahteraan subjektif perempuan dengan profesi guru sekolah dasar. INSAN, 2(1). 44-50. doi: 10.20473/jpkm.v2i1217
Aulia, F. (2019). Model kesejahteraan siswa sekolah dasar. (Disertasi Tidak Dipublikasi) Fakultas Psikologi. Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogjakarta
Ascher, C. (1988). Improving the home-school connection for low-income urban parents. Urban Review, 20(1), 109–123.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Diener, E. & Diener, R. B. 2008. Happiness: Unlocking The Mysteries Of Psychological Wealth. USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Diener, E. (2009). Assesing well-being: the collected works of ed diener. Illionos: Springer
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 1-11
Elmore, G. M., & Huebner, E. S. (2010). Adolescents' satisfaction with school experiences: Relationships with demographics, attachment relationships, and school engagement behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 47(6), 525- 537.
Eid, M., & Larsen, R. (2008). The Science Of Subjective Well-Being: A Tribute To Ed Diener. New York: Guilford Publications.
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal Of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92.
Fujita, F., Diener, E., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: The case for emotional intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61 427-434.
Helsen, M., Vollebergh, W., & Meeus, W. (2000). Social Support from Parents and Friends and Emotional Problems in Adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29(3), 319–335. doi:10.1023/a:1005147708827
Hill, N. E., & Taylor, L. C. (2004). Parental school involvement and childrens academic achievement: Pragmatics and issues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(4), 161–164.
Hurlock, E. B. (1993). Psikologi Perkembangan. Suatu Pendekatan Sepanjang Rentang Kehidupan (edisi kelima). Jakarta: Erlangga.
Holloway, I., & Todres, L. (2003). The status of method: flexibility, consistency and coherence. Qualitative Research, 3(3), 345-357
Julika, S., & Setiyawati, D. (2019). Kecerdasan emosional stres akademik, dan kesejahteraan subjektif pada mahasiswa. Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology, 5(1), 50-59. Doi 10.22146/gamajop.47966
Lent, R. W. (2004). Toward a unifying theoretical and practical perspective on well-being and psychosocial adjustment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(4), 482
Lucas, R.E., Clark, A.E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2004). Unemployment alters the set-point for life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 15, 8-13.
Kavetros, Georgios & Koutrumpis, Pantelis,(2011). Technological affluence and subjective well being. Journal of Economic Psychologi, 32 742 – 753.
Kim-Prieto C, Diener E, Tamir M, (2005) Integrating the diverse definitions of happiness: A timesequential framework of subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies 6(3): 261–300.
Konu, A, & Rimpela, M. (2002). Well-being in schools: A conceptual model. Journal of Health Promotion International. 17. 79-87.
Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step- by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 9(3).
Moleong, L. 2005. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Rosdakarya
Moya, I. G.-, Brooks, F., Morgan, A., & Moreno, C. (2015). Citation for published version?: Document Version?: This is the Accepted Manuscript version . This Manuscript version is distributed under the terms of the. 74(6).
Mroczek, D.K., & Spiro, A., III. (2005). Change in life satisfaction during adulthood: Findings from the Veterans Affairs Normative Aging Study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 189-202
Karyani, U., Prihartanti, N., Dinar, W., Lestari, R., Hertinjung, W. S., Prasetyaningrum, J., & Yuwono, Y. (2015). The dimensions of student well-being. In Seminar Psikologi & Kemanusiaan, Psychology Forum UMM. Prosiding Seminar
KEMENKES, R. (2018). Hasil utama RISKESDAS 2018. Kementrian Kesehatan Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan. Jakarta
Konu, A, & Rimpela, M. (2002). Well-being in schools: A conceptual model. Journal of Health Promotion International. 17. 79-87.
Qonitatin, S. Widyawati, and G. Y. Asih, “ Katarsis dalam menulis ekspresif sebagai intervensi depresi ringan pada mahasiswa,” Jurnal Psikologi, vol. 9(1)
Prasetiyo & Andriani. 2011. Hubungan antara kecerdasan emosi dengan subjective well being pada mahasiswa tingkat pertama. Proceeding PESAT (Psikologi, Ekonomi, Sastra, Arsitektur & Sipil). 4, 22-26
Rahayu, T. P. (2016). Determinan Kebahagiaan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 18(1), 149.
Santrock, J. W. (2002). Life-Span Development:Perkembangan Masa Hidup (Edisi Kelima). Jakarta: Erlangga.
Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2000). Value priorities and subjective well?being: Direct relations and congruity effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(2), 177-198
Siedlecki, Karen L, Salthouse,Timothy A,Oishi Shigehiro, & Jeswani Sheena.(2014). The Relationship Between Social Support and Subjective Wellbeing Across Age. Social Indicators Research An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality of Life Measurement. 117(2), 561-576
Stebbins, R. A. (2001). Exploratory research in the social sciences (Vol. 48).
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Utami, M, S., Praptomojati, A., Wulan, D, L. A., & Fauziah, Y. (2018). Self- esteem, forgiveness, perception of family harmony, and subjective well- being in adolescents, Internasional Journal of research studies in Psychology, 7(1), 59-72.
Widiana, W & Rusli, D. (2020). Pengaruh self-efficacy subjective well-being pada mahasiswa yang sidang skripsi di jurusan psikologi unp. Jurnal Riset Psikologi, 2020(1)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Muhammad Ardiansyah, Farah Aulia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
