Faktor Penentu Kesejahteraan Subjektif Mahasiswa : Sebuah Studi Eksploratif di Universitas Negeri Padang

Main Article Content

Muhammad Ardiansyah
Farah Aulia

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengeksplorasi faktor penentu kesejahteraan subjektif  mahasiswa di Universitas Negeri Padang. Metode penelitian ini adalah kualitatif eksplorasi dengan jumlah responden sebanyak 115 mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Padang di Kota Padang yang dipilih melalui teknik cluster sampling. Pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik kuesioner yang disebar pada mahasiswa di seluruh fakultas di Universitas negeri Padang di kota Padang. Data yang diperoleh kemudian dianalisis menggunakan analisis tematik dan melalui proses keabsahan data dengan peer debriefing. Penelitian ini menemukan enam tema utama yang menjadi determinan kesejahteraan mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Padang di Kota Padang. Keenam determinan tersebut antara lain adalah faktor individu mahasiswa (32.62%), kepuasan dalam relasi (24.55%), kepuasan akademik (17.36%), ekonomi (12.28%), kepuasan terhadap diri (6.60%), dan afeksi  (6.59%).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ardiansyah, M., & Aulia, F. (2021). Faktor Penentu Kesejahteraan Subjektif Mahasiswa : Sebuah Studi Eksploratif di Universitas Negeri Padang. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(1), 1661–1668. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v5i1.1157
Section
Articles of Research

References

Anindya, A.S., & Soetjiningsih, C.H. (2017). Kepuasan perkawinan degan kesejahteraan subjektif perempuan dengan profesi guru sekolah dasar. INSAN, 2(1). 44-50. doi: 10.20473/jpkm.v2i1217

Aulia, F. (2019). Model kesejahteraan siswa sekolah dasar. (Disertasi Tidak Dipublikasi) Fakultas Psikologi. Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogjakarta

Ascher, C. (1988). Improving the home-school connection for low-income urban parents. Urban Review, 20(1), 109–123.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Diener, E. & Diener, R. B. 2008. Happiness: Unlocking The Mysteries Of Psychological Wealth. USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Diener, E. (2009). Assesing well-being: the collected works of ed diener. Illionos: Springer

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 1-11

Elmore, G. M., & Huebner, E. S. (2010). Adolescents' satisfaction with school experiences: Relationships with demographics, attachment relationships, and school engagement behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 47(6), 525- 537.

Eid, M., & Larsen, R. (2008). The Science Of Subjective Well-Being: A Tribute To Ed Diener. New York: Guilford Publications.

Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal Of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92.

Fujita, F., Diener, E., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: The case for emotional intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61 427-434.

Helsen, M., Vollebergh, W., & Meeus, W. (2000). Social Support from Parents and Friends and Emotional Problems in Adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29(3), 319–335. doi:10.1023/a:1005147708827

Hill, N. E., & Taylor, L. C. (2004). Parental school involvement and childrens academic achievement: Pragmatics and issues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(4), 161–164.

Hurlock, E. B. (1993). Psikologi Perkembangan. Suatu Pendekatan Sepanjang Rentang Kehidupan (edisi kelima). Jakarta: Erlangga.

Holloway, I., & Todres, L. (2003). The status of method: flexibility, consistency and coherence. Qualitative Research, 3(3), 345-357

Julika, S., & Setiyawati, D. (2019). Kecerdasan emosional stres akademik, dan kesejahteraan subjektif pada mahasiswa. Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology, 5(1), 50-59. Doi 10.22146/gamajop.47966

Lent, R. W. (2004). Toward a unifying theoretical and practical perspective on well-being and psychosocial adjustment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(4), 482

Lucas, R.E., Clark, A.E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2004). Unemployment alters the set-point for life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 15, 8-13.

Kavetros, Georgios & Koutrumpis, Pantelis,(2011). Technological affluence and subjective well being. Journal of Economic Psychologi, 32 742 – 753.

Kim-Prieto C, Diener E, Tamir M, (2005) Integrating the diverse definitions of happiness: A timesequential framework of subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies 6(3): 261–300.

Konu, A, & Rimpela, M. (2002). Well-being in schools: A conceptual model. Journal of Health Promotion International. 17. 79-87.

Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step- by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 9(3).

Moleong, L. 2005. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Rosdakarya

Moya, I. G.-, Brooks, F., Morgan, A., & Moreno, C. (2015). Citation for published version?: Document Version?: This is the Accepted Manuscript version . This Manuscript version is distributed under the terms of the. 74(6).

Mroczek, D.K., & Spiro, A., III. (2005). Change in life satisfaction during adulthood: Findings from the Veterans Affairs Normative Aging Study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 189-202

Karyani, U., Prihartanti, N., Dinar, W., Lestari, R., Hertinjung, W. S., Prasetyaningrum, J., & Yuwono, Y. (2015). The dimensions of student well-being. In Seminar Psikologi & Kemanusiaan, Psychology Forum UMM. Prosiding Seminar

KEMENKES, R. (2018). Hasil utama RISKESDAS 2018. Kementrian Kesehatan Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan. Jakarta

Konu, A, & Rimpela, M. (2002). Well-being in schools: A conceptual model. Journal of Health Promotion International. 17. 79-87.

Qonitatin, S. Widyawati, and G. Y. Asih, “ Katarsis dalam menulis ekspresif sebagai intervensi depresi ringan pada mahasiswa,” Jurnal Psikologi, vol. 9(1)

Prasetiyo & Andriani. 2011. Hubungan antara kecerdasan emosi dengan subjective well being pada mahasiswa tingkat pertama. Proceeding PESAT (Psikologi, Ekonomi, Sastra, Arsitektur & Sipil). 4, 22-26

Rahayu, T. P. (2016). Determinan Kebahagiaan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 18(1), 149.

Santrock, J. W. (2002). Life-Span Development:Perkembangan Masa Hidup (Edisi Kelima). Jakarta: Erlangga.

Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2000). Value priorities and subjective well?being: Direct relations and congruity effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(2), 177-198

Siedlecki, Karen L, Salthouse,Timothy A,Oishi Shigehiro, & Jeswani Sheena.(2014). The Relationship Between Social Support and Subjective Wellbeing Across Age. Social Indicators Research An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality of Life Measurement. 117(2), 561-576

Stebbins, R. A. (2001). Exploratory research in the social sciences (Vol. 48).

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Utami, M, S., Praptomojati, A., Wulan, D, L. A., & Fauziah, Y. (2018). Self- esteem, forgiveness, perception of family harmony, and subjective well- being in adolescents, Internasional Journal of research studies in Psychology, 7(1), 59-72.

Widiana, W & Rusli, D. (2020). Pengaruh self-efficacy subjective well-being pada mahasiswa yang sidang skripsi di jurusan psikologi unp. Jurnal Riset Psikologi, 2020(1)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.