Eksplorasi Faktor-Faktor Komitmen Organisasi pada Pegawai
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v8i2.15049Keywords:
Komitmen, Organisasi, PegawaiAbstract
Komitmen organisasi mengacu pada sikap individu terhadap organisasinya yang didasari oleh hubungan afektif, kontinuans, maupun normatif. Studi sebelumnya menunjukkan bahwa komitmen organisasi mengarah ke loyalitas pegawai dan kinerja yang lebih baik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi komitmen organisasi pada pegawai. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah studi literatur pada artikel-artikel hasil penelitian yang dipublikasikan di jurnal internasional dengan akses terbuka (open access). Penelusuran jurnal internasional pada rentang tahun 2019-2024 menggunakan beberapa laman seperti Science Direct dan Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ) dan diperoleh 12 artikel yang sesuai dengan kriteria. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa terdapat 3 (tiga) faktor yang mempengaruhi komitmen organisasi yaitu; faktor individu, faktor pekerjaan, dan faktor organisasi. Temuan lain adalah belum ada penelitian yang membahas mengenai intervensi yang dapat meningkatkan komitmen organisasi baik dalam setting individu, pekerjaan atau organisasi sehingga dapat dilakukan penelitian lebih lanjut untuk mengembangkan penelitian terkait intervensi pada komitmen organisasi.
References
Allen, N. J., dan Meyer, J. P. (1991). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. J. Occup. Psychol. 63, 1–18. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
Bajcar, B., Bablak, J. (2022). Transformational and Transactional Leadership in the Polish Organizational Context: Validation of the Full and Short Forms of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.908594
Ly, B. (2024). Inclusion leadership and employee work engagement: The role of organizational commitment in Cambodian public organization. Asia Pacific Management Review. 29(1), 44-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2023.06.003
Eisenberger, R., Cummings, J., Armeli, S., and Lynch, P. (1997). Perceived organizational Support, Discretionary Treatment, and Job Satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 812–820. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.812
Hirschi, A., Spurk, D. (2021). Ambitious employees: Why and when ambition relates to performance and organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103576
Hngoi, C.L., Abdullah, N.A., Sulaiman, W.S.W., Nor, N.I.Z. (2024). Examining job involvement and perceived organizational support toward organizational commitment: job insecurity as mediator. Frontiers in Psychology. 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1290122
Kharisma, M., Prasilowati, S. L., & Ayuningtyas, E. A. (2019). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi Dan Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Dengan Komitmen Organisasi Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Jurnal Pengembangan Wiraswasta, 21(2), 135. https://doi.org/10.33370/jpw.v21i2.342
Suryani, I. (2018). Factors affecting organizational commitment. Jurnal Manajemen dan Inovasi. 9(1), 26-34.
Syarifin, M.H., Atmaja, H.A. (2023). The influence of organizational commitment, organizational culture and job satisfaction on employee performance: a literature study. Journal Of Humanities, Social Sciences and Business (JHSSB). 2(3), 458-467.
Jackson, J. C., Gelfand, M., dan Ember, C. R. (2020). A global analysis of cultural tightness in non-industrial societies. Proc. Biol. Sci. 287:20201036. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1036
Judge, T. A., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2012). On the value of aiming high: The causes and consequences of ambition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(4), 758–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0028084.
Kaufmann, LM., Wheeler, MA., Sojo, VE. (2021). Employment Precarity Strengthens the Relationships Between the Dark Triad and Professional Commitment. Frontiers in Psychology.12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.673226
Kiazad, K., Holtom, B. C., Hom, P. W., and Newman, A. (2015). Job embeddedness: a multifoci theoretical extension. J. Appl. Psychol. 100:641. doi: 10.1037/a0038919
Martins MS., Nascimento, JL., Hernandez, MIZ. (2022). Employees’ emotional awareness as an antecedent of organizational commitment—The mediating role of affective commitment to the leader. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.945304
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842.
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
Rego, A., and Fernandes, C. (2005). Inteligência emocional. contributos adicionais para a validação de um instrumento de medida. Psicologia 19, 139–167. doi: 10.17575/rpsicol.v19i1/2.401
Salovey, P., and Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagin. Cogn. Pers. 9, 185–211. doi: 10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDG
Santo, D.D., Talamo, A., Bonaiuto, F., Cabras, C., Pierro, A. (2021). A Multilevel Analysis of the Impact of Unit Tightness vs. Looseness Culture on Attitudes and Behaviors in the Workplace. Frontiers in Psychology. 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652068
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Manag. J. 38, 1442–1465. doi: 10.5465/256865
Stoltz, P. G. (1997). Adversity Quotient: Turning Obstacles Into Opportunities. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Szabo´, ZP., Diller, SJ., Czibor, A., Restas´ P., Jonas, E., Frey, D.(2023). “One of these things is not like the others”: The associations between dark triad personality traits, work attitudes, and work-related motivation. Personality and Individual Differences. 205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112098
Xu, C., Wei, D., Liu, J., Zhou, J. (2021). A Tale of Two Capitals: How Task-Oriented and Guanxi-Oriented Psychological Capitals Lead to a Sustainable Workforce in Rural China. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.732445
Yu, B., Meng, Y., Li, C., Liu, D. (2022). How Does Employees’ Narcissism Influence Organizational Commitment? The Role of Perceived Supervisor Support and Abusive Supervision. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.910739
Yoon, DY., Hyun Han, CS., Kyoung Lee, S., Cho, J., Sung, M., Han, SJ. (2022). The critical role of job embeddedness: The impact of psychological empowerment and learning orientation on organizational commitment. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1014186
Zhao, Y., Sang, B. (2023). The role of emotional quotients and adversity quotients in career success. Frontiers in Psychology. 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128773
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ludfia Sulistianingrum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
