Romantika Kepemimpinan, Efikasi Diri dan Inisiatif Diri Upaya Meningkatkan Motivasi Kepemimpinan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v6i1.3039Keywords:
Romantika Kepemimpinan, Efikasi Diri, Inisiatif Diri, Motivasi KepemimpinanAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan mencari faktor-faktor yang dapat menjelaskan motivasi memimpin pada tingkat bintara Polres Lebak. Analisis dilakukan dengan menguji pengaruh romantika kepemimpinan, efikasi diri dan inisiatif diri terhadap motivasi memimpin. Pendekatan penelitian menggunakan kuantitatif survey dari total populasi 100 orang digunakan 80 sampel berasal dari anggota tingkat Bintara Polres Lebak. Temuan yang menarik dari penelitian ini adalah pengaruh parsial dan simultan dari variabel dependen dan variabel indefenden. Pengujian secara simultan dengan memperhatikan nilai R Square sebesar 0,569 hal ini berarti secara simultan pengaruh romantika kepemimpinan, efikasi diri dan inisiatif diri terhadap motivasi memimpin adalah sebesar 56,9 % sedangkan sisanya sebesar 43,1 % dipengaruhi oleh faktor lain di luar model penelitian ini. Hasil ini memberikan kesimpulan bahwa secara simultan dan parsial, romantika kepemimpinan, efikasi diri dan inisiatif diri dapat dijadikan variabel prediktor bagi motivasi memimpin. Temuan menunjukan bahwa pimpinan harus menyadari pentingnya memberikan dukungan dan menghargai romantika kepemimpinan, efikasi diri dan inisiatif diri yang tinggi pada anggota agar melahirkan rasa nyaman dan keyakinan terhadap kemampuan individu dalam menjalankan tugasnya yang dapat memperkuat pemahaman dan solidaritas diantara para anggota untuk menciptakan keunggulan bagi organisasi dengan cara memberikan motivasi, memberikan kesempatan yang sama, pelatihan kepemimpinan berbasis kompetensi, mempererat rasa kekeluargaan sesama anggota, mempertemukan anggota dengan pekerjaan dan jabatan yang sesuai.
References
Badura, Katie L., Grijalva, Emily, Galvin, Benjamin M., Owens, Bradley P., & Joseph, Dana L. (2020). Motivation to lead: A meta-analysis and distal-proximal model of motivation and leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000439
Bandura, Albert. (1977a). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191
Bandura, Albert. (1977b). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Bandura, Albert. (1978). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4
Bhatti, Omar K., Aslam, Uzma S., Hassan, Arif, & Sulaiman, Mohamed. (2016). Employee motivation from an Islamic perspective. Humanomics. https://doi.org/10.1108/H-10-2015-0066
Bligh, Michelle C., Kohles, Jeffrey C., & Pillai, Rajnandini. (2011). Romancing leadership: Past, present, and future. Leadership Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.003
Borkovec, T. D. (1978). Self-efficacy: Cause or reflection of behavioral change? Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(78)90003-6
Chan, Kim Yin, & Drasgow, Fritz. (2001). Toward a theory of individual differences and leadership: Understanding the motivation to lead. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.481
Cherian, Jacob, & Jacob, Jolly. (2013). Impact of Self Efficacy on Motivation and Performance of Employees. International Journal of Business and Management. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v8n14p80
Felfe, Jörg, & Petersen, Lars Eric. (2007). Romance of leadership and management decision-making. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320600873076
Felfe, Jörg, & Schyns, Birgit. (1108). Journal of Managerial Psychology Romance of leadership and motivation to lead. Journal of Managerial Psychology Organization Development Journal International Journal of Manpower.
Felfe, Jörg, & Schyns, Birgit. (2014). Romance of leadership and motivation to lead. Journal of Managerial Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-03-2012-0076
Flammer, August. (2015). Self-Efficacy. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.25033-2
Hino, Kenta, & Aoki, Hidetaka. (2013). Romance of leadership and evaluation of organizational failure. Leadership and Organization Development Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-08-2011-0079
Juliansyah Noor. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian. Igarss 2014.
Kark, Ronit, & Van Dijk, Dina. (2007). Motivation to lead, motivation to follow: The role of the self-regulatory focus in leadership processes. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.24351846
Ling, Bin, & Guo, Yue. (2020). Affective and Cognitive Trust as Mediators in the Influence of Leader Motivating Language on Personal Initiative. International Journal of Business Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488420915503
Lunenburg, Fred C. (2011). Goal-Setting Theory of Motivation. International Journal of Management, Business, and Administration.
Lung-Guang, Niu. (2019). Decision-making determinants of students participating in MOOCs: Merging the theory of planned behavior and self-regulated learning model. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.004
Meindl, J. R., Ehrlich, S. B., & Dukerich, J. M. (2006). The romance of leadership. In Small Groups: Key Readings. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203647585Meindl, James R., Ehrlich, Sanford B., & Dukerich, Janet M. (2006). The romance of leadership. In Small Groups: Key Readings. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203647585
Meindl, James R., & Ehrlich, Sanford B. (1987). The Romance of Leadership and The Evaluation of Organizational Performance. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.5465/255897
Pajares, Frank. (2002). Overview of Social Cognitive Theory and Self Efficacy.
Rathnayake, Chamil. (2010). Romance of leadership in the public sector higher education in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900691003703761
Schyns, Birgit, & Hansbrough, Tiffany. (2012). The Romance of Leadership Scale and Causal Attributions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00922.x
Starzyk, Anita, & Sonnentag, Sabine. (2019). When do low-initiative employees feel responsible for change and speak up to managers? Journal of Vocational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103342
Stiehl, Sibylle K., Felfe, Jörg, Elprana, Gwen, & Gatzka, Magdalena B. (2015). The role of motivation to lead for leadership training effectiveness. International Journal of Training and Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12051
Styhre, Alexander. (2002). How Process Philosophy can Contribute to Strategic Management. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.475
Zacher, Hannes, Schmitt, Antje, Jimmieson, Nerina L., & Rudolph, Cort W. (2019). Dynamic effects of personal initiative on engagement and exhaustion: The role of mood, autonomy, and support. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2277
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ahmad Ahmad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
