Patient Measure Of Safety (PMOS) For Measuring Patient Perception Of Safety In Hospital: Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v6i2.4963Keywords:
Patient Measure Of Safety, Keselamatan Pasien, Rumah SakitAbstract
Kompleksitas sistem layanan kesehatan dan meningkatnya bahaya pada pasien di fasilitas layanan kesehatan menjadikan keselamatan pasien sebagai prioritas utama di pelayanan kesehatan. Pasien sebagai pengamat utama pada layanan mereka, namun tidak banyak keterlibatan pasien untuk memperbaiki keselamatan pasien di rumah sakit. Patient Measure of Safety (PMOS) merupakan alat untuk mengkaji faktor yang memiliki kontribusi terhadap keselamatan pasien. Tujuan dari systemic review ini adalah untuk mengkaji kelayakan PMOS untuk mengidentifikasi faktor yang berkontribusi pada keselamatan di rumah sakit. Pencarian literatur secara online dilakukan pada Pubmed, Proquest dan Google Scholar berdasarkan guideline PRISMA dan menghasilkan 502 artikel. Artikel yang tidak berhubungan berdasarkan kriteria eksklusi dikeluargakan dan berdasarkan teks penuh, 5 artikel dipilih untuk systemic review ini. Berdasarkan artikel yang telah dipilih, PMOS mampu menemukan kelemahan laten pada pelayanan kesehatan, identifikasi faktor yang berkontribusi terhadap keselamatan berdasarkan persepsi pasien, seperti keterlambatan atau komunikasi dan Kerjasama yang tidak baik. Sebagai bagian dari pengukur terhadap sebuah intervensi, PMOS dapat mendeteksi permasalahan yang biasanya terlewatkan di manajemen rumah sakit. Oleh karena itu, keunikan umpan balik dari persepsi pasien mampu didapatkan melalui PMOS, sebagai alat yang layak, valid dan dapat diandalkan untuk mengukur faktor keselamatan melalui persepsi pasien. Kombinasi PMOS dengan alat keselamatan dan perbaikan berkelanjutan mampu menjaga dan memperbaiki keselamatan dari pelayanan kesehatan.
References
de Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care [Internet]. 2008 Jun [cited 2022 May 22];17(3):216–23. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18519629/
Patient Safety [Internet]. [cited 2022 May 22]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/patient-safety
Crossing the Global Quality Chasm: Improving Health Care Worldwide. Crossing the Global Quality Chasm [Internet]. 2018 Dec 27 [cited 2022 May 22]; Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30605296/
WHO. Global patient safety action plan 2021–2030: towards eliminating avoidable harm in health care. Geneva; 2021.
Ricci-Cabello I, Pons-Vigués M, Berenguera A, Pujol-Ribera E, Slight SP, Valderas JM. Patients’ perceptions and experiences of patient safety in primary care in England. Family Practice [Internet]. 2016;33(5):535–42. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/fampra/article/33/5/535/2197608
Donaldson LJ, Donaldson L. The wisdom of patients and families: ignore it at our peril. Available from: http://www.ichom.org/why-we-do-it/
Lawton R, Armitage G. The role of the patient in clinical safety. London; 2012 May.
Giles SJ, Parveen S, Hernan AL. Validation of the Primary Care Patient Measure of Safety (PC PMOS) questionnaire. BMJ Qual Saf [Internet]. 2019 May 1 [cited 2022 May 6];28(5):389–96. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30337498/
Giles SJ, Lawton RJ, Din I, McEachan RRC. Developing a patient measure of safety (PMOS). BMJ Quality & Safety [Internet]. 2013 Jul 1 [cited 2022 May 9];22(7):554–62. Available from: https://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/22/7/554
Phelan S, Lin F, Mitchell M, Chaboyer W. Implementing early mobilisation in the intensive care unit: An integrative review. Int J Nurs Stud [Internet]. 2018 Jan 1 [cited 2022 May 26];77:91–105. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29073462/
Cleyle S, Booth A. Clear and present questions: Formulating questions for evidence based practice. Library Hi Tech. 2006 Jul 1;24(3):355–68.
CASP CHECKLISTS - CASP - Critical Appraisal Skills Programme [Internet]. [cited 2022 May 26]. Available from: https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/
McEachan RRC, Lawton RJ, O’Hara JK, Armitage G, Giles S, Parveen S, et al. Developing a reliable and valid patient measure of safety in hospitals (PMOS): A validation study. BMJ Quality and Safety. 2014;23(7):565–73.
Sarvi F, Ghaffari M, … MEM journal of the, 2019 undefined. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Patient Measure of Safety (PMOS). ncbi.nlm.nih.gov [Internet]. [cited 2022 May 26]; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc6825390/
Hernan A. Developing the PC PMOS, a Primary-Care Patient Measure Of Safety [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://aphcri.anu.edu.au
Baxter R, Taylor N, Kellar I, Pye V, open MMB, 2018 undefined. Identifying positively deviant elderly medical wards using routinely collected NHS safety thermometer data: an observational study. bmjopen.bmj.com [Internet]. [cited 2022 May 26]; Available from: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/2/e020219.abstract
New L, Goodridge D, Kappel J, Lawson J, Dobson R, Penz E, et al. Perceptions of hospital safety for inpatients with chronic kidney disease: A cross-sectional quantitative study. The CANNT Journal. 30(1).
Taylor N, Hogden E, Clay-Williams R, Li Z, Lawton R, Braithwaite J. Older, vulnerable patient view: a pilot and feasibility study of the patient measure of safety (PMOS) with patients in Australia. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2016 Jun 1 [cited 2022 May 28];6(6):e011069. Available from: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/6/e011069
Schiavone S, Annecchiarico A, Lisi D, Mensorio MM, Attena F. Evaluation of patients’ perception of safety in an italian hospital using the pmos-30 questionnaire. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021 May 1;18(9).
Louch G, Reynolds C, Moore S, Marsh C, Heyhoe J, Albutt A, et al. Validation of revised patient measures of safety: PMOS-30 and PMOS-10. BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 1;9(11).
Murphy D, Livingston C, Henriksen B, Dawson A, Singh H, Bond N. Perceptions vs Reality of Patient Flow and Work7ow in a Primary Care Setting. 2018;
Marca-Frances G, Frigola-Reig J, Menéndez-Signorini JA, Compte-Pujol M, Massana-Morera E. Defining patient communication needs during hospitalization to improve patient experience and health literacy. BMC Health Services Research [Internet]. 2020 Feb 21 [cited 2022 May 28];20(1):1–9. Available from: https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-020-4991-3
Lawton R, O’Hara JK, Sheard L, Armitage G, Cocks K, Buckley H, et al. Can patient involvement improve patient safety? A cluster randomised control trial of the Patient Reporting and Action for a Safe Environment (PRASE) intervention. BMJ Quality & Safety [Internet]. 2017 Aug 1 [cited 2022 May 28];26(8):622–31. Available from: https://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/26/8/622
O’Hara JK, Lawton RJ, Armitage G, Sheard L, Marsh C, Cocks K, et al. The patient reporting and action for a safe environment (PRASE) intervention: a feasibility study. BMC Health Services Research [Internet]. 2016 Nov 28 [cited 2022 May 28];16(1):1–14. Available from: https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-016-1919-z
Jeong HJ, Han SH, Liao HH, Lee WC. Healthcare professionals’ perception of hospital and unit-Level managers’ contribution to improving safety. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal [Internet]. 2020 Mar 9 [cited 2022 May 28];Volume 9(Issue 2):47–52. Available from: https://medcraveonline.com/BBIJ/BBIJ-09-00299.php
Baxter R, Taylor N, Kellar I, Lawton R. A qualitative positive deviance study to explore exceptionally safe care on medical wards for older people. BMJ Quality & Safety [Internet]. 2019 Aug 1 [cited 2022 May 28];28(8):618–26. Available from: https://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/28/8/618
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Cattleya Ananda VildaAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
