An Analysis on Students’ Classroom Interaction in Speaking Class at SMAN 1 Bangkinang

Authors

  • Yeniawati Yeniawati Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai, Indonesia
  • Wida Rianti Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai, Indonesia
  • Masrul Masrul Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v7i3.10337

Keywords:

Interaksi Kelas, Kelas Berbicara

Abstract

Penelitian kualitatif ini dilaksanakan di SMAN 1 Bangkinang kelas XII IPS 2 tahun ajaran 2022/2023. Analisis keterampilan berbicara siswa dalam penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana interaksi kelas siswa pada kelas berbicara di SMAN 1 Bangkinang. Subyek penelitian ini terdiri dari 20 siswa, 11 siswa laki-laki dan 9 siswa perempuan. Instrumen penelitian adalah angket dan dokumentasi. Berdasarkan hasil temuan, dalam interaksi peserta didik-konten sebanyak 25% siswa tidak memahami materi berbicara dan memahami tugas-tugas pembelajaran yang diberikan oleh guru. Sedangkan dalam interaksi pelajar-pelajar, 75% siswa tidak tertarik untuk berlatih berbicara bahasa Inggris dan sebanyak 35% siswa tidak memahami penjelasan yang diberikan oleh temannya pada saat presentasi. Sementara itu, peneliti menemukan adanya interaksi yang baik antara guru dan siswa, antusiasme yang tinggi ketika mendapatkan motivasi dan keinginan untuk bertanya kepada guru jika mereka tidak mengerti.

References

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arini, L. D. (n.d.). Classroom Interaction Analysis In The Efl Speaking Class ( A Case Study at the Second Semester of English Departm ...

Asilestari, P. (2018). an Analysis on Students’ Speaking Skill At the First Grade of Administration Office of Smk Yplp Pgri Bangkinang. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 2(1), 288–300. https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/255

Asilestari, P., Pahlawan, U., & Tambusai, T. (2021). Journal of English Language and Education The Effect of Short Movie toward Students ’ Speaking Skill. 6850(2), 39–49.

Beverley Hancock, et al.(2009). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. The NIHR RDS for the East Midlands / Yorkshire & the Humber. Page 16

Brown, D H. 2001. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Pearson Education Longman

Creswell, John W. 2014. Research Design, Qualitatives, Quantitative, and mixed Methods Approcahes (Fourth Edition). United State of America: Sage Publications.

Dagarin, Mateja. 2004. Classroom interaction and communication strategies in learning English as a foreign language. English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries (ELOPE): Studies in the English language and literature in Slovenia. Journal volume I/1-2: ISSN 1581-8918.

Daar, G. F. (2020). Classroom Interaction In English Speaking Class (A Study At Sma Santu Fransiskus Ruteng, Flores). Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 5(3), 311. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v5i3.437

Elismawati, E. (2018). Classroom Interaction Analysis in the EFL Speaking Class: A Study at English Department of IAIN Imam Bonjol Padang. Journal Polingua: Scientific Journal of Linguistic Literatura and Education, 5(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.30630/polingua.v5i1.21

Graham, S. (1997). Effective Language Learning. British Library Cataloging in Publication Data.

Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Pearson Education: Longman.

Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Learning. Malaysia: Pearson Education Limited.

Howarth, P. (2001). “Process Speaking. Preparing to Repeat Yourself”. MET. V, 10, n.1, Pp:39-44.

Ilham, I., Bafadal, M. F., & Muslimin, M. (2020). An Analysis of Students’ Speaking Ability on Specific Purpose of Learning. Linguistics and ELT Journal, 7(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.31764/leltj.v7i1.1013

Kaunang, C. J. (2018). Using Project-Based Learning in Enhancing Students’ Speaking Skill at SMA PSKD 7. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 3(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v3i2.704

Malamah-Thomas, A. (1987). Classroom Interaction. In: Mingzhi. (2005). Enhancing interaction in our EFL classroom. CELEA Journal Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 56-62

Marleni, L. (2018). The effect of using video as media toward students’ speaking skill. Journal of English Language and Education, 3(1), 24–36.

Marleni, L., & Asilestari, P. (2019). Developing Social Media-Based Textbook for Speaking Class in English Study Program. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 4(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v4i1.1764

Masrul. (2016). A Study of Students’ Assessment in Writing Skills of the English Language. Jurnal PAUD Tambusai, 2(2), 36–42.

Mellany, M. (2011). An Analysis of Classroom interaction to Develop Speaking Ability. 1–11.

Mingzhi, X. (2005). Enhancing interaction in our EFL classroom. CELEA Journal Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 56-62

Oktaviani, E. B. (2019). An Analysis of Verbal Classroom interaction and its Characteristics: Flanders’ Interaction Faculty of Languages and Arts.

Rianti, W. (2017). Improving Students Learning Outcome of English By Using Role Playing At SDN 022 Rumbio. Journal of English Languange Education, 2(2), 36–47. https://jele.or.id/index.php/jele/article/view/30

Rustandi, A., & Mubarak, A. H. (2006). Analysis of IRF (Initiation-Response-Feedback) on Classroom Interaction in EFL Speaking Class. ??????? ????? ????, 1999(December), 1–6.

Sangadah, K., & Kartawidjaja, J. (2020). Analyzing Students’ and Teacher’s Interaction in English Learning Classroom at The Eighth Grade of SMP Negeri 20 Makassar in The Academic Year of 2020. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 21(1), 1–9.

Sarosdy, et al. (2006). Applied Linguistics I. Ertekunki az Ember: Unpublished.

Sharliz, A. A. (2017). Classroom Interaction in English Speaking Class: A Naturalistic Study at Queen English Course Karanganyar. 110265, 110493.

Siyoto, S (2015). Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. In Literasi Media. Literasi Media.

Sundari, H. (2017). Classroom Interaction in Teaching English as Foreign Language at Lower Secondary Schools in Indonesia. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(6), 147. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.6p.147

Syamsuddin, A. R. & Damayanti, V. S. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa. Bandung: Rosda.

Thomas, K. (2006). Art and Iconoclasm in Early Modern England. Religious Politics in Post-Reformation England. Essays in Honour of Nocholas Tyacke, 1(1), 16–40. http://thesis.ekt.gr/thesisBookReader/id/1834#page/104/mode/2up

Veronica. 2015. The Instructional Process: A Review of Flanders Interaction Analysis in a Classroom Setting. International journal of Secondary Education. Vol.3 No. 5, pp. 43-49

Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring Classroom Discourse: Language in Action. Oxon: Routlege Taylor & Francis Group.

Zizo, K. (2004). The Role of Classroom Interaction in Improving the Students’ Speaking Skill.

Downloads

Published

27-10-2023

How to Cite

Yeniawati, Y., Rianti, W., & Masrul, M. (2023). An Analysis on Students’ Classroom Interaction in Speaking Class at SMAN 1 Bangkinang. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(3), 23463–23474. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v7i3.10337

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 3 (2023): Desember 2023

Section

Articles of Research

Citation Check

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Yeniawati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).