Faktor-faktor yang Berperan dalam Pemalasan Sosial (Social loafing): Sebuah Kajian Literatur
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v4i2.611Keywords:
pemalasan sosial, faktor-faktor yang berperan pemalasan sosialAbstract
Pemalasan sosial (Social Loafing) merupakan kecenderungan untuk mengurangi motivasi dan usaha ketika mengerjakan tugas secara kelompok dibandingkan bekerja secara individu. Tujuan dari kajian literatur ini untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor yang berperan dan mempengaruhi pemalasan sosial. Metode yang digunakan yaitu kajian literatur. Artikel yang direview pada kajian literature berkisar tahun 2010-2020 yang ditelusuri melalui online research data base. Hasil dari penelusuran menunjukkan bahwa pemalasan sosial dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor. Faktor yang berperan dalam pemalasan sosial yaitu faktor situasional seperti tidak adanya evaluasi dari kontribusi individu, ketidakjelasan pembagian tanggung jawab, struktur kelompok, interaksi kelompok, karakteristik tugas, harga diri dan efikasi diri, perbedaan gender, prokrastinasi akademik, kohesivitas kelompok, dan faktor kepribadian
References
Aggarwal, P., & O’Brien, C. L. (2008). Social loafing on group projects: structural antecedents and effect on student satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education, 30(3), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475308322283
Permana, H., Harahap, F., & Astuti, B. (2016). Hubungan antara efikasi diri dengan kecemasan dalam menghadapi ujian pada siswa kelas IX di MTs Al Hikmah Brebes. Hisbah: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling dan Dakwah Islam, 13(2), 51-68.
Atoum, A. O., & Farah, A. M. (1993). Social loafing and personal involvement among jordanian college students. Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 133, pp. 785–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1993.9713939.
Atikah, A., & Hariyadi, S. (2019). Social loafing dalam mengerjakan tugas kelompok ditinjau dari the big five personality traits pada mahasiswa. Intuisi: Jurnal Psikologi Ilmiah, 11(1), 55-63.
Aulia, H., & Saloom, G. (2013). Pengaruh kohesifitas kelompok dan self efficacy pada anggota organisasi kedaerahan di lingkungan uin syarif hidayatullah jakarta. Jurnal of Psychology, 18(1), 79–88.
Carron, A. V., Burke, S. M., & Prapavessis, H. (2004). Self-Presentation and group influence. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 16(1), 41–58.
Comer, D. R. (1995). A model of social loafing in real work groups. Human Relations, 48(6), 647–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679504800603
Ferrante, C. J., Green, S. G., & Forster, W. R. (2006). Getting more out of team projects: Incentivizing leadership to enhance performance. Journal of Management Education, 30(6), 788–797. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562906287968.
Ferrari, J. R., & Pychyl, T. A. (2012). " If I Wait, My Partner Will Do It:" The Role of Conscientiousness as a Mediator in the Relation of Academic Procrastination and Perceived Social Loafing. North American Journal of Psychology, 14(1).
Fitriana, H., & Saloom, G. (2018). Prediktor social loafing dalam konteks pengerjaan tugas kelompok pada mahasiswa. Jurnal Psikologi dan Kesehatan Mental, Vol. 3(No. 1), hal. 13-22. https://doi.org/10.20473/jpkm.v3i12018.13-22
George, J. M. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic origins of perceived social loafing in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.5465/256478
Hall, D., & Buzwell, S. (2013). The problem of free-riding in group projects: Looking beyond social loafing as reason for non-contribution. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412467123
Jassawalla, A., Sashittal, H., & Malshe, A. (2009). Students’ perceptions of social loafing: Its antecedents and consequences in undergraduate business classroom teams. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(1), 42–54.
Karau, S. J., & Hart, J. W. (2015). Group cohesiveness and social loafing?: effects of a social interaction manipulation on individual motivation within groups. 2, 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.2.3.185
Krisnasari, E. S. D., & Purnomo, J. T. (2017). Hubungan kohesivitas dengan kemalasan sosial pada mahasiwa the relationship between cohesiveness and social loafing on undergraduate student. Jurnal Psikologi, 13(1), 13–21.
Lam, C. (2015). The role of communication and cohesion in reducing social loafing in group projects. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 78(4), 454–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490615596417
Latane, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work?: the causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822–832.
Mahmudi, M. H., & Suroso, S. (2014). Efikasi diri, dukungan sosial dan penyesuaian diri dalam belajar. Persona: Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, 3(02), 183–194.
Matthew H. Hagen A. (2015). Combating social loafing performance reductions in virtual groups with increased cohesion, reduced deindividuation, and heightened evaluation potential through self-disclosure.
Mukti, B., & Tentama, F. (2019). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi efikasi diri akademik. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Magister Psikologi Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, 341–347.
Myers, David G. (2012). Psikologi Sosial Jilid 2. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika
Narotama, I. B. I., & Rustika, I. M. (2019). Peran harga diri dan efikasi diri terhadap social loafing pada mahasiswa preklinik program studi sarjana kedokteran dan profesi dokter fakultas kedokteran universitas udayana. Jurnal Psikologi Udayana, 6(3), 1281–1292.
Piezon, S. L. (2008). Perceptions of social loafing in online learning groups: a study of public university and u.s. naval. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2).
Purba, R. A. S. (2018). Hubungan self-efficacy dan social loafing tendency pada mahasiswa. LWSA Conference Series 01, 1(1), 258–263.
Romi Satria Wahono. (2015). A systematic literature review of software defect prediction: research trends, datasets, methods and frameworks. Journal of Software Engineering, 1.
Sarwono, S. W. (2005). Psikologi sosial: Psikologi Kelompok dan Psikologi Terapan. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Schippers, M. C. (2014). Social loafing tendencies and team performance: The compensating effect of agreeableness and conscientiousness. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(1), 62-81.
Shiue, Y. C., Chiu, C. M., & Chang, C. C. (2010). Exploring and mitigating social loafing in online communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 768-777.
Singh, S., Wang, H., & Zhu, M. (2018). Perceptions of social loafing during the process of group Development. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3161269
Singh, S., Wang, H. & Zhu, M. (2018). Perceptions of social loafing in groups: role of 23 conflict and emotions. Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3132871
Sivandani, A., Koohbanani, S. E., & Vahidi, T. (2013). The relation between social support and self-efficacy with academic achievement and school satisfaction among female junior high school students in birjand. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84(2011), 668–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.623
Stephanie, s and Ermida, s (2015). “Intensi social loafing pada tugas kelompok”. Jurnal Experiential. Vol-3. Hal 35-45.
Sumantri, M. A., & Pratiwi, I. (2020). Locus of control: Upaya untuk menurunkan social loafing. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan, 8(1), 10.
Teng, C. C., & Luo, Y. P. (2014). Effects of perceived social loafing, social interdependence, and group affective tone on students’ group learning performance. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(1), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0177-2.
Terry, D. J., & Kearnes, M. (1993). Effects of an audience on the task performance of subjects with high and low self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 15(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(93)90020-4
Tozlu, E., Ate?o?lu, H., ?ahin, Z., & ?en, E. (2016). The effects of organizational commitment on social loafing behaviour at higher education institutions. International Refereed Academic Social Sciences Journal, 20162216502(22), 96–96. https://doi.org/10.17364/iib.20162216502.
Ülke, H. E., & Bilgiç, R. (2011). Investigating the role of the big five on the social loafing of information technology workers. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19(3), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2011.00559.x
Webb, N. M. (1997). Assessing students in small collaborative groups. Theory into Practice, 36(4), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849709543770
Wen, L., Yang, H., Bu, D., Diers, L., & Wang, H. (2018). Public accounting vs private accounting, career choice of accounting students in China. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, Vol. 8, Issue: 1, 124–140.
Ying, X., Li, H., Jiang, S., Peng, F., & Lin, Z. (2014). Group laziness: The effect of social loafing on group performance. Social Behavior and Personality, 42(3), 465–472. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2014.42.3.465
Zahra, Y., Eliana, R., Budiman, Z., & Ferry, N. (2015). Peran jender dan social loafing tendency terhadap prestasi akademik dalam konteks pembelajaran kooperatif. Jurnal Pemikiran & Penelitian Psikologi, 10(1), 1–9. Retrieved from www.jurnal.usu.ac.id/psikologia
Zainuddin, K., & Fakhri, N. (2017). Social loafing dan peran gender pada mahasiswa. Jurnal Psikologi Talenta, 3(1).
Zhu, M., & Wang, H. (2018). A Literature review of social loafing and teams with group development. SSRN Electronic Journal, 7–23. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3176383
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Kardila Desta Pratama, Farah Aulia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
